Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00742
Original file (PD2012 00742.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1200742
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army         BOARD DATE: 20130409
SEPARATION DATE: 20021017


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5(91W/PRACTICAL NURSE) medically separated for neck pain due to cervical degenerative disk disease (DDD). The pain started while working in the emergency room in Korea in 1999. The neck condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The neck condition, characterized as cervical DDD, was forwarded to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The IPEB adjudicated chronic neck pain as unfitting rated 20% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI appealed to the Formal PEB; however, he withdrew his appeal, and was medically separated with a 20% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: The CI writes: “The degree of pain and suffering related to disc conditions that have caused chronic pain condition. Hypertension which started in the military and continues. Hearing loss/tinnitus which has caused a depressive condition. Tendonitis in ankles and knees all (can’t make out word) I sleep very little. Pain and depression—inner ear nerve (can’t make out word) have periods of anxiety—depression. Panic attacks that are related to ongoing conditions. I have HTN had readings greater than 100 diastolic that were (can’t read word) and headaches now I’m on medication.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting neck pain is addressed below. The contended conditions of hypertension, hearing loss/tinnitus, and depression are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the respective Service Board for Correction of Military Records. The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws.







RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20020703
 VA - (7 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
CHRONIC NECK PAIN DUE TO CERVICAL DDD
 5099-5003 20% DDD OF THE CERVICAL SPINE 5010-5293 10% 20020321
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 8 20020321
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 60%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 21121 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

CHRONIC NECK PAIN. The CI’s history of chronic neck pain in 2001 was preceded by a history of shoulder pain in 1999. Since that time he reported pain in neck and thoracic spine, radiation to left arm and numbness/burning sensation with and without associated activity. He was treated conservatively, and underwent manipulation therapy with unsustained improvement. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the thoracic spine dated 17 December 2001, was normal; however, the cervical spine showed a C3-4 disk bulge/osteophyte complex which touches the thecal sac. The neural foramen were narrowed bilaterally secondary to vertebral and facet joint hypertrophy; similar findings were noted at C5-6, and C6-7. On 1 March 2002, approximately 7 months prior to separation, orthopedic examination revealed normal sensory, motor and reflex examinations, and a positive spurling test (suggests nerve root compression). There was focal tenderness to palpation; however, no spasms or neurological deficits were noted. At the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) evaluation, 3 March 2002, approximately 7 months prior to separation, the CI reported neck, shoulder and back pain with spasms on a regular basis. On physical examination, gait was not recorded; there was full cervical range-of-motion (ROM) with pain. Sensation was intact in all extremities and motor strength was normal; reflexes were symmetrical. The CI’s SF 2808 MEB 3 March 2003, on examination, noted there was cervical spine tenderness to palpation with pain. Neurovascular exam was noted to be intact. At the Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination, 21 March, 2002, 7 months prior to separation, the CI reported the pain was constant and radiated to his lower back and left arm. The CI described numbness of left arm with lifting. Physical examination revealed normal gait and posture, normal strength and reflexes, and full cervical ROM.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the condition under the degenerative arthritis code of 5003 at 20%, the maximum rating allowed under this code, and applied the pain policy, citing marked and frequent pain. The VA rated the condition using the 5293 code (intervertebral disc syndrome) and assigned a rating of 10% because there was full ROM of the cervical spine with pain. The Board considered a rating under this code since the CI reported radicular symptoms; however, after discussion, the Board agreed there was no evidence of ratable peripheral nerve impairment in this case, since no motor weakness was present and sensory symptoms had no functional implication. There was no evidence of incapacitating episodes for a higher rating under 5293. Given the record of evidence the Board could find no other applicable VARSD codes for consideration. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic neck pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy DoDI 1332.39 for rating chronic neck pain was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the chronic neck pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Neck Pain
 5003 20%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120604, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130009521 (PD201200742)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-00696

    Original file (PD-2013-00696.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chronic neck and lumbar pain conditions, characterized as “cervical spine pain and lumbar spine pain” and “mild degenerative disk disease (DDD), cervical spine,” were the only conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic neck pain,” and “chronic lumbar pain”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10% respectively, with likely application ofthe Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01569

    Original file (PD-2012-01569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was given several profiles for his neck. The CI did have minimal tenderness at the prior to separation neurological consultation and had slight tightness of the neck muscles at the MEB examination in addition to the positive MRI findings. A neurosurgical consult to the MEB on 26 March 2002 (10 months prior to separation) noted normal gait, normal ROM of the lumbar spine, and normal sensation, strength, and reflexes.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01864

    Original file (PD2012 01864.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ratings for the unfitting chronic neck and lower back condition(s)is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. The record in evidence reasonably support that both conditions were unfitting and should be rated separately. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00699

    Original file (PD-2012-00699.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The PEB rated the condition 10% citing neck pain without radiculopathy, analogous to 5295 lumbosacral strain with characteristic pain on motion. Under the VASRD rules in effect at time of separation, with minimal tenderness, normal ROM of cervical spine, no radiculopathy, and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00078

    Original file (PD2013 00078.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was evaluated for reported symptoms of paresthesias of the right upper extremity, but cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 9 January 2001 did not show spinal canal stenosis or nerve encroachment and nerve conduction studies on 13 April 2001 did not show any evidence of radicuolpathy.The CI was involved in another MVA on 26 June 2001 and was seen in the ER for “right shoulder, neck and low back pain;” the exam noted only right trapezius muscle tenderness, no spinal tenderness,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00808

    Original file (PD2012 00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded chronic back pain and chronic neck pain as medically unacceptablefor Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication IAW AR 40-501.The PEB adjudicated the “chronic pain, neck and LBP, without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated together as 10% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the “unbundled” chronic neck pain condition, the Board unanimously agrees it was not separately unfitting and that it cannot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01381

    Original file (PD2012 01381.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating for the unfitting cervical spine condition is addressed below;no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. At both the MEB and May 2002 VA exams the CI reported neck and right arm pain and numbness of the right arm with occasional problems dropping things; both exams showed decreased, painful cervical ROM with mildly decreased right hand strength noted,with decreased sensation also noted in the VA exam. xxPresident Physical Disability Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01680

    Original file (PD2012 01680.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were no spasms or neurological deficits noted.At the MEB/narrative summary (NARSUM) evaluation, 13 June 2003, performed approximately 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported pain on motion of his neck without numbness or tingling. Physical examination revealed normal strength and reflexes, decreased sensation from the shoulder to the tip of finger and ROM of 40 degree flexion, 50 on extension, and bilateral bending to 30 with bilateral rotation of 60. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01750

    Original file (PD2012 01750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA assigned a40% rating for the back condition rated 5292-5293 citing severe limitation of motion of the lumbar spine. The discussed the C&P examination report that the CI held on a chair and compared that examination with prior examinations and concluded the examination confirmed characteristic pain on motion but did not evidence muscle spasm.The Board also considered if additional disability rating was justified for peripheral nerve impairment due to radiculopathy.Although there was...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01988

    Original file (PD-2014-01988.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The exam noted full neck range-of-motion (ROM) with pain and normal strength, sensation, and reflexes of the bilateral UE. At a PT visit the CI reported the LBP radiated to the right posterior mid-thigh and at a primary care visit on 23 June 2009 he reported numbness...